7/3/1949 - 12/7/2010
December 7, 2010
The President Obama press conference - short take
Ladies and gentlemen, as we all know the GOP are ruthless, unprincipled, hostage-taking thugs who have spent the last two years throwing bombs into traffic.
But I'm sure the more power they get, the nicer they'll be.
If not, well then one of these fine days I'll stand up to them over something and then they'll see!
Unless they, y'know, take another hostage.
Which they totally won't do!
Unlike those fucking fuckers on the Left.
Thank you.
But I'm sure the more power they get, the nicer they'll be.
If not, well then one of these fine days I'll stand up to them over something and then they'll see!
Unless they, y'know, take another hostage.
Which they totally won't do!
Unlike those fucking fuckers on the Left.
Thank you.
<thank you Driftglass>
This is Trance music. The real kind. It's supposed to build up for 5 minutes like that
Best results when played at 5:30am for the enitre household - and with excessive volume.
Day Four: Zappadan
From the album We're Only in it For the Money: What's the Ugliest Part of Your Body?. 1968. RIP Frank Zappa. 12/21/40 - 12/4/93
Bush Tax Cuts at a Glance
Compare and contrast: How much $ taxpayers at different income levels would get from the Democratic plan, which was to simply extend the cuts for income under $250,000, and the Republican plan, which was to extend the cuts for everyone:
The term "tax cuts for the middle class," was coined by some Democrat and it's mostly bullshit. The left side of the chart shows that the "tax cuts for the middle class" also cut taxes on the rich. A family earning $750,000 a year would pay lower taxes on the first $250,000 of their income. The question has never been whether only middle-class workers should get a tax cut. It's how much income the tax cut should cover.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)